Metallic finishes are a defining feature of modern automotive coatings.
Behind these finishes, the selection of metallic pigments directly affects appearance, durability, processing efficiency, and overall cost.
Two commonly used materials are aluminium paste and aluminium powder.
Although both are aluminium-based pigments, their performance and application behaviour differ significantly in automotive coating systems.
Aluminium paste consists of aluminium flakes pre-dispersed in a carrier medium (solvent or water).
Aluminium powder is a dry metallic pigment, typically flake-shaped, requiring dispersion during formulation.
This fundamental difference influences coating performance, consistency, and processing complexity.
Aluminium Paste
Pre-dispersed flakes allow uniform orientation within the coating film
Produces high brightness, smooth metallic gloss, and strong flop effect
Ideal for premium OEM basecoat/clearcoat systems
Aluminium Powder
Metallic appearance depends heavily on dispersion quality
Greater risk of flake agglomeration, which can reduce gloss uniformity
Visual consistency varies with formulation and processing conditions
Appearance Takeaway: Aluminium paste delivers more predictable and consistent metallic effects, especially on large automotive panels.
Automotive coatings must withstand UV radiation, moisture, temperature cycling, and chemical exposure.
Aluminium Paste
Commonly features resin- or silica-treated flakes
Improved resistance to oxidation and environmental degradation
Supports long-term gloss retention and colour stability
Aluminium Powder
Can perform well when properly treated, but untreated powders are more prone to oxidation
Often requires additional additives or processing to match paste durability
Durability Takeaway: Surface-treated aluminium paste generally offers superior long-term durability in demanding automotive environments.
| Aspect | Aluminium Paste | Aluminium Powder |
| Dispersion | Ready to use | Requires intensive dispersion |
| Batch consistency | High | Variable |
| Dust generation | Low | High |
| Production safety | Better | Requires stricter controls |
Aluminium paste simplifies formulation and reduces processing variability, while aluminium powder demands greater technical control.
Aluminium powder usually has a lower raw material price
Aluminium paste has a higher unit cost due to flaking, treatment, and dispersion processes
However, total cost also includes:
Processing time
Waste and rework risk
Performance consistency
In high-end automotive coatings, aluminium paste often provides better overall value, despite higher initial material cost.
Aluminium Paste is commonly used in:
OEM automotive basecoats
Refinish metallic paints
High-gloss and premium finishes
Aluminium Powder is more common in:
Cost-sensitive or industrial coatings
Applications where dispersion control is available
Less appearance-critical systems
Not fully. While aluminium powder can create metallic effects, aluminium paste offers better consistency, durability, and ease of use in modern systems.
Yes. With appropriate surface treatment, aluminium paste performs reliably in waterborne formulations.
Aluminium paste, due to its liquid form, reduces dust-related safety risks compared to aluminium powder.
Both aluminium paste and aluminium powder play roles in automotive coatings.
The optimal choice depends on performance requirements, processing capability, and cost targets.
Aluminium paste excels in metallic appearance, durability, and formulation reliability
Aluminium powder offers cost advantages but requires greater technical control
As automotive coatings continue to evolve toward higher aesthetic standards and longer service life, aluminium paste remains the preferred solution for most premium metallic applications.